Bossuyt P., Lijmer J., and Mol B. Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient. Lancet 356:1844, 2000.

 

Deeks J. and Altman D. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ 329: 168, 2004.

 

Devillé W., et al. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2:9,2002.

 

Haynes R B, and Wilczynski N. Optimal search strategies for retrieving from Medline: analytical survey scientifically strong studies of diagnosis. BMJ 328:1040, 2004.

Knottnerus J, van Weel C and Muris J.Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Evaluation of diagnostic procedures. BMJ 324;477-480, 2002.

 

Knottnerus JA ed. The Evidence Base of Clinical Diagnosis. London, England: BMJ books; 2002.

Lijmer J., et al. Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests. JAMA 282:1061-1066,1992.

Montori V., et. al.Tips for teachers of evidence-based medicine: 5. The effect of spectrum of disease on the performance of diagnostic tests. CMAJ : 173, 2005.

 

Pai M, et. al. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test evaluations: what’s behind the scenes? Evid. Based Med. 9:101,2004.

Pewsner D., et. al. Ruling a diagnosis in or out with "SpPIn" and "SnNOut": a note of caution. BMJ 329;209-213, 2004.

Richardson W., et. al. Tips for Teachers of Evidence-based Medicine: Making Sense of Diagnostic Test Results Using Likelihood Ratios. J Gen Intern Med 23:87–92, 2007.

Rutjes A., et. al.Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ: 174, 2006.

 

Schünemann H., et al. GRADE: grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ 336 :1106, 2008.

Whiting P., et, al.Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med 140:189-202, 2004.